Parmenides 132c-133a and the Development of Plato's Thought

Phronesis 24 (3):230-240 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this paper I argue against the view of G.E.L. Owen that the second version of the Third Man Argument is a sound objection to Plato's conception of Forms as paradigms and that Plato knew it. The argument can be formulated so as to be valid, but Plato need not be committed to one of its premises. Forms are self-predicative, but the ground of self-predication is not the same as that of ordinary predication.

Similar books and articles

Parmenides and Plato's Parmenides 131a-132c.Henry Teloh - 1976 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (2):125-130.
Likeness and likelihood in the Presocratics and Plato.Jenny Bryan - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Two recent interpretations of Plato's parmenides.Egil A. Wylter - 1963 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 6 (1-4):200 – 211.
Plato's reception of Parmenides.John Anderson Palmer - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Plato’s parmenides. [REVIEW]Patricia Curd - 2000 - The Classical Review 50 (02):488-489.
Anaxagoras betwixt parmenides and Plato.John E. Sisko - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (6):432-442.
Plato's Parmenides.Constance C. Meinwald - 1991 - New York: Oxford University Press.


Added to PP

289 (#62,018)

6 months
77 (#49,566)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Prior
Santa Clara University

Citations of this work

Definição da definição.Constança Barahona - 2013 - Filosofia Antiga E Medieval (Encontro Nacional Anpof).

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references