Phenomenal Concepts Are Consistent With Wittgenstein's Private Language Argument (short version)

AL-Mukhatabat (06):98-105 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Phenomenal Concepts are Consistent with Wittgenstein’s Private Language Argument.Francois-Igor Pris - 2014 - NB: Philosophical Investigations (Russian E-Journal) 7:64-98.
Phenomenal Concepts and the Private Language Argument.David Papineau - 2011 - American Philosophical Quarterly 48 (2):175.
Kripke, Wittgenstein, and the private language argument.Petra von Morstein - 1980 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 11 (1):61-74.
There are no phenomenal concepts.Derek Ball - 2009 - Mind 118 (472):935-962.
Beyond the private language argument.Paul K. Moser - 1992 - Metaphilosophy 23 (1-2):77-89.
Essays on Wittgenstein.Elmer Daniel Klemke - 1971 - Urbana,: University of Illinois Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-09

Downloads
556 (#29,405)

6 months
54 (#69,438)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On Clear and Confused Ideas.R. Millikan - 2001 - Cambridge Studies in Philosophy.
Phenomenal Concepts and the Private Language Argument.David Papineau - 2011 - American Philosophical Quarterly 48 (2):175.

Add more references