International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (3):433-458 (2010)
The two main challenges of the theory of conceptual content presented by Robert Brandom in Making It Explicit are to account for a referential dimension of conceptual content and to account for the objectivity of conceptual norms. Brandom tries to meet both these challenges in chapter 8 of his book. I argue that the accounts presented there can only be understood if seen against the background of Brandom's theory of communication developed in chapter 7. This theory is motivated by the well-known problem that semantic holism threatens the possibility of communication because it has the consequence that words mean different things in different mouths. Brandom offers a solution to this problem in terms of what he calls recurrence commitments. I show that chapter 8 of Making It Explicit should be understood as arguing that a practice that includes acknowledging interpersonal recurrence commitments institutes both conceptual contents with a referential dimension and objective conceptual norms. I close by raising the objection that Brandom's argument can only show that conceptual norms are communally shared and not that they are objective. I propose an emendation of this argument, having recourse to a practice Brandom refers to as rational rectification in his new book Between Saying and Doing
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism.Robert Brandom - 2000 - Harvard University Press.
Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment.Robert B. Brandom - 1994 - Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Politicizing Brandom's Pragmatism: Normativity and the Agonal Character of Social Practice.Thomas Fossen - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):371-395.
Similar books and articles
Genuine Normativity, Expressive Bootstrapping, and Normative Phenomenalism.David Lauer - 2009 - Etica and Politica / Ethics & Politics 11 (1):321-350.
Scorekeeping in a Defective Language Game.Kevin Scharp - 2005 - Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (1):203-226.
Brandom on the Normativity of Meaning.Lionel Shapiro - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (1):141-60.
Communication and Content: Circumstances and Consequences of the Habermas-Brandom Debate.Kevin Scharp - 2003 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (1):43 – 61.
Answerable to the World: Experience and Practical Intentionality in Brandom's and McDowell's "Intramural" Debate.Steven Hendley - 2010 - Theoria 76 (2):129-151.
Communication and Rational Responsiveness to the World.Robert Briscoe - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (2):135-159.
Brandom on Communication.Kevin Scharp - forthcoming - In Jason Hannon & Robert Rutland (eds.), Philosophical Profiles in the Theory of Communication. McGill-Queen's University Press.
Making It Implicit: Brandom on Rule-Following.Anandi Hattiangadi - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):419-31.
Brandom on Two Problems of Conceptual Role Semantics.Gabor Forrai - 2009 - In Barbara Merker (ed.), Vertehen nach Heidegger und Brandom.
Added to index2010-08-11
Total downloads47 ( #107,780 of 2,151,996 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,812 of 2,151,996 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.