Oxford University Press (2004)
The Law of Non-Contradiction - that no contradiction can be true - has been a seemingly unassailable dogma since the work of Aristotle, in Book G of the Metaphysics. It is an assumption challenged from a variety of angles in this collection of original papers. Twenty-three of the world's leading experts investigate the 'law', considering arguments for and against it and discussing methodological issues that arise whenever we question the legitimacy of logical principles. The result is a balanced inquiry into a venerable principle of logic, one that raises questions at the very centre of logic itself. The aim of this volume is to present a comprehensive debate about the Law of Non-Contradiction, from discussions as to how the law is to be understood, to reasons for accepting or re-thinking the law, and to issues that raise challenges to the law, such as the Liar Paradox, and a 'dialetheic' resolution of that paradox. The editors contribute an introduction which surveys the issues and serves to frame the debate, and a useful bibliography offering a guide to further reading. This volume will be of interest to anyone working on philosophical logic, and to anyone who has ever wondered about the status of logical laws and about how one might proceed to mount arguments for or against them.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$69.00 used (54% off) $112.94 new (25% off) $138.41 direct from Amazon (8% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BC199.C6.L38 2004|
|ISBN(s)||0199265178 9780199265176 9780199204199|
The Barber, Russell's Paradox, Catch-22, God, Contradiction and More: A Defence of a Wittgensteinian Conception of Contradiction.Laurence Goldstein
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Vagueness, Logic and Use: Four Experimental Studies on Vagueness.Phil Serchuk, Ian Hargreaves & Richard Zach - 2011 - Mind and Language 26 (5):540-573.
Free of Detachment: Logic, Rationality, and Gluts.Jc Beall - 2015 - Noûs 49 (2):410-423.
Is Dialetheism an Idealism? The Russellian Fallacy and the Dialetheist's Dilemma.Francesco Berto - 2007 - Dialectica 61 (2):235–263.
From Mathematical Fictionalism to Truth‐Theoretic Fictionalism.Bradley Armour‐Garb & James A. Woodbridge - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (1):93-118.
Similar books and articles
The Barber, Russell's Paradox, Catch-22, God, Contradiction and More: A Defence of a Wittgensteinian Conception of Contradiction.Laurence Goldstein - 2004 - In Graham Priest, Jc Beall & Bradley Armour-Garb (eds.), The law of non-contradiction: new philosophical essays. Oxford University Press. pp. 295--313.
Review of Graham Priest, JC Beall, Bradley Armour-Garb (Eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays. [REVIEW]Roy Cook - 2005 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (9).
The Law of Non‐Contradiction and Chinese Philosophy.Xinyan Jiang - 1992 - History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (1):1-14.
The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays Edited by Graham Priest, J.C. Beall and Bradley Armour-Garb.Graham Stevens - 2006 - Philosophical Books 47 (3):273-275.
Łukasiewicz on the Principle of Contradiction.Venanzio Raspa - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Research 24:57-112.
Meaning, Metaphysics, and Contradiction.Francesco Berto - 2006 - American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (4):283-297.
Laws of Non-Contradiction, Laws of the Excluded Middle, and Logics.Greg Restall - 2006 - In Graham Priest, J. C. Beall & Bradley Armour-Garb (eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays. Clarendon Press.
The Law of Non-Contradiction as a Metaphysical Principle.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Logic 7:32-47.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads93 ( #56,119 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #73,516 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?