What should a deflationist about truth say about meaning?

Philosophical Issues 8:107-115 (1997)

Authors
Huw Price
Cambridge University
Abstract
Paul Horwich aims to apply some the lessons of deflationism about truth to the debate about the nature of a theory of meaning. Having pacified the philosophical debate about truth to his satisfaction, he wants to use a bridge between truth and meaning to extend the same peace−making techniques into new territory. His goal is to make the debate about meaning more hospitable for an account based on use, by showing that certain apparent obstacles to such a theory are illusory, given deflationism about truth.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/1522997
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,665
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Reducing Truth Through Meaning.Robert Trueman - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (4):823-832.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Inconsistency of Deflationary Truth and Davidsonian Meaning.Kari Middleton - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:99-103.
Truth -- Meaning -- Reality.Paul Horwich - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Meaning's Role in Truth.Charles Travis - 1996 - Mind 105 (419):451-466.
Truth or Meaning? A Question of Priority.John Collins - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (3):497-536.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
139 ( #51,334 of 2,242,735 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #500,077 of 2,242,735 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature