A new problem for the A-theory of time

Philosophical Quarterly 50 (201):494-498 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX


: I offer a new approach to the increasingly convoluted debate between the A- and B-theories of time, the ‘tensed’ and ‘tenseless’ theories. It is often assumed that the B-theory faces more difficulties than the A-theory in explaining the apparently tensed features of temporal experience. I argue that the A-theory cannot explain these features at all, because on any physicalist or supervenience theory of the mind, in which the nature of experience is fixed by the physical state of the world, the tensed properties of time posited by the A-theory could play no role in shaping temporal experience. It follows that the A-theory is false; even a priori arguments for it fail, because they still require the tensed vocabulary which is used to describe temporal experience.


Added to PP

875 (#10,221)

6 months
58 (#28,896)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Simon Prosser
University of St. Andrews

Citations of this work

Why Does Time Seem to Pass?Simon Prosser - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):92-116.
Presentism, eternalism, and the growing block.Kristie Miller - 2013 - In Heather Dyke & Adrian Bardon (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 345-364.
Passage and Perception.Simon Prosser - 2013 - Noûs 47 (1):69-84.

View all 22 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The unreality of time.John Ellis McTaggart - 1908 - Mind 17 (68):457-474.
Real time II.David Hugh Mellor - 1998 - New York: Routledge.
Language and time.Quentin Smith - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 9 references / Add more references