Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (11):682-687 (2011)
Next SectionIn an online study conducted separately in the UK and the US, participants rated the acceptability and fairness of four interventions: two types of financial incentives and two types of medical interventions. These were stated to be equally effective in improving outcomes in five contexts: weight loss and smoking cessation programmes, and adherence in treatment programmes for drug addiction, serious mental illness and physiotherapy after surgery. Financial incentives were judged less acceptable and to be less fair than medical interventions across all five contexts. Context moderated the relative preference between rewards and penalties: participants from both countries favoured rewards over penalties in weight loss and treatment for serious mental illness. Only among US participants was this relative preference moderated by perceived responsibility of the target group. Overall, participants supported funding more strongly for interventions when they judged members of the target group to be less responsible for their condition, and vice versa. These results reveal a striking similarity in negative attitudes towards the use of financial incentives, rewards as well as penalties, in improving outcomes across a range of contexts, in the UK and the USA. The basis for such negative attitudes awaits further study
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Law, Policy, and Ethics of Employers' Use of Financial Incentives to Improve Health.Kristin M. Madison, Kevin G. Volpp & Scott D. Halpern - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (3):450-468.
Acceptability of Offering Financial Incentives to Achieve Medication Adherence in Patients with Severe Mental Illness: A Focus Group Study.S. Priebe, J. Sinclair, A. Burton, S. Marougka, J. Larsen, M. Firn & R. Ashcroft - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (8):463-468.
Health Literacy, Health Inequality and a Just Healthcare System.Angelo E. Volandes & Michael K. Paasche-Orlow - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (11):5 – 10.
Improving Health Care Outcomes Through Personalized Comparisons of Treatment Effectiveness Based on Electronic Health Records.Sharona Hoffman & Andy Podgurski - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (3):425-436.
Why Liberals Should Accept Financial Incentives for Organ Procurement.Robert M. Veatch - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (1):19-36.
On the Possibility of a Positive-Sum Game in the Distribution of Health Care Resources.Joshua Cohen & Edwige Burg - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (3):327 – 338.
Attitudes of Academic and Clinical Researchers Toward Financial Ties in Research: A Systematic Review.Bonnie E. Glaser & Lisa A. Bero - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):553-573.
Ethics and Incentives: An Evaluation and Development of Stakeholder Theory in the Health Care Industry.Heather Elms, Shawn Berman & Andrew C. Wicks - 2002 - Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (4):413-432.
In Tepid Defense of Population Health: Physicians and Antibiotic Resistance.Richard S. Saver - unknown
Monetary Incentives, What Are They Good For?Daniel Read - 2005 - Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (2):265-276.
Do Corporations Invest Enough in Environmental Responsibility?Yongtae Kim & Meir Statman - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 105 (1):115-129.
Financial Incentives for Patients in the Treatment of Psychosis.G. Szmukler - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (4):224-228.
Added to index2011-10-19
Total downloads11 ( #402,380 of 2,168,526 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,757 of 2,168,526 )
How can I increase my downloads?