Thesis Eleven 143 (1):97-114 (2017)

Authors
Alexei Procyshyn
Monash University
Abstract
Two trends have emerged in recent work from the Frankfurt School: the first involves a reconsideration of immanent critique’s basic commitments and viability for critical social theory, while the second involves an effort to introduce temporal considerations for social interaction into critical theorizing to help make sense of the phenomenon of social acceleration. This article contributes to these ongoing discussions by investigating whether social systems theory, in which temporal relations play a primary role, can be integrated with immanent critique. If such a synthesis were successful, it would promise to unify two distinct forms of social theorizing that have often been taken to be orthogonal or incommensurate since the debate between Luhmann and Habermas in the 1970s. The investigation proceeds in three parts: first, the article delineates immanent critique’s conditions of success; second, using these conditions, it identifies potential points of contact between social systems theorizing and immanent critical forms of analysis, while exemplifying these commonalities via a case study; finally, the article argues that, although immanent critique is not a strict method of analysis or investigation, its success conditions preclude social systems theory on the grounds that the latter approach cannot anchor itself within the context of analysis in the way ‘immanent critique’ requires.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1177/0725513617741167
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,968
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Habermas and the Project of Immanent Critique.Titus Stahl - 2013 - Constellations 20 (4):533-552.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Defending Immanent Critique.Dan Sabia - 2010 - Political Theory 38 (5):684-711.
Habermas and the Project of Immanent Critique.Titus Stahl - 2013 - Constellations 20 (4):533-552.
Critical Systems Theory.Andreas Fischer-Lescano - 2012 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (1):3-23.
Herbert Marcuse: An Immanent Critique.Richard J. Bernstein - 1971 - Social Theory and Practice 1 (4):97-111.
Deleuze and Beckett: An Immanent Encounter.Magdalena Wisniowska - 2014 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 8 (2):173-198.
""From the" Gotcha!" to Immanent Critique.Holly Moore - 2012 - philoSOPHIA: A Journal of Continental Feminism 2 (1):87-91.
Immigration Policy and "Immanent Critique".Marit Hovdal Moan - 2008 - Ethics and International Affairs 22 (2):205–211.
Explaining Social Systems Without Humans.P. M. Hejl - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (2):189-192.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-12-14

Total views
11 ( #791,508 of 2,403,328 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,892 of 2,403,328 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes