Overall theme of Mirowski's essay

Abstract

Let’s look at Wikipedia itself, which is misunderstood constantly as “self-organizing and selfcorrecting.” In fact there is a strict hierarchy of levels of editorship. Also, “high-quality articles tend to experience entropic degradation … as various Wiki-workers … tinker with them” (423). Most Wiki-work is Sisyphean fight against constant vandalism, and most articles never converge on any stable form.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

What's Kuhn got to do with it?Philip Mirowski - 2003 - Social Epistemology 17 (2-3):229-239.
On reviewing machine dreams : Zoomed-in versus zoomed-out.Lawrence A. Boland - 2006 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (4):480-495.
Experience and its modes.Michael Oakeshott - 1933 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Forgiving and Hoping.David T. Ozar - 2008 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 82:163-172.
Comment.Philip Mirowski - 1993 - Social Epistemology 7 (3):278 – 283.
Wikies and Rethinking Author-ity.George Teschner - 2011 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 18 (1):11-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-01-24

Downloads
31 (#488,695)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Protevi
Louisiana State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references