Russell’s reasons for logicism

Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):267-292 (2006)
What is at stake philosophically for Russell in espousing logicism? I argue that Russell's aims are chiefly epistemological and mathematical in nature. Russell develops logicism in order to give an account of the nature of mathematics and of mathematical knowledge that is compatible with what he takes to be the uncontroversial status of this science as true, certain and exact. I argue for this view against the view of Peter Hylton, according to which Russell uses logicism to defend the unconditional truth of mathematics against various Idealist positions that treat mathematics as true only partially or only relative to a particular point of view.
Keywords Russell  logicism  Bradley  Hylton  idealism  monism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/hph.2006.0029
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,827
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Frege, Dedekind, and the Origins of Logicism.Erich H. Reck - 2013 - History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (3):242-265.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
98 ( #56,614 of 2,210,098 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #80,404 of 2,210,098 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature