In Ian Phillips (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Temporal Experience. London, UK: pp. 146-156 (2017)

Authors
Simon Prosser
University of St. Andrews
Abstract
In this chapter I argue that despite its current popularity the doctrine of the specious present, or at least every current version of it, should be rejected. I describe two alternative accounts, which deal with experiences of two different kinds of change. The first is what I call the dynamic snapshot theory, which accounts for the way we experience continuous changes such as motion and other motion-like phenomena. The second account deals with the way we experience discontinuous changes, those for which there is no finite rate of change. However I then argue that much of the current debate implicitly presupposes a problematic Cartesian view about the nature of conscious experience. If this view is rejected – as I think it should be – then a different kind of account emerges that avoids commitment both to the specious present and to its main current rival, the cinematic view.
Keywords Specious present  change  time consciousness
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2018
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Consciousness Explained.Daniel C. Dennett - 1993 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (4):905-910.
Scientific Thought.C. D. Broad - 1923 - Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Quining Qualia.Daniel C. Dennett - 1988 - In Anthony J. Marcel & E. Bisiach (eds.), [Book Chapter]. Oxford University Press.
What is It Like to Be a Bat?Thomas Nagel - 2003 - In John Heil (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Experiencing (in) Time.Jack Shardlow - 2019 - Dissertation, University of Warwick

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Present Vs. The Specious Present.Jiri Benovsky - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (2):193-203.
Temporal Experiences Without the Specious Present.Valtteri Arstila - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (2):287-302.
Some Metaphysical Questions About the Doctrine of the 'Specious Present'.C. T. K. Chari - 1951 - Philosophical Quarterly (India) 23 (October):129-138.
The Specious Present.J. D. Mabbott - 1955 - Mind 64 (July):376-383.
Duration and the Specious Present.Gustav Bergmann - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (January):39-47.
Relative and Absolute Presence.Sean Enda Power - 2016 - In B. Mölder, V. Arstila & P. Øhrstrøm (eds.), Philosophy and Psychology of Time. Springer. pp. 69-100.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-11-03

Total views
689 ( #10,006 of 2,462,779 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
66 ( #12,052 of 2,462,779 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes