Philosophical Studies 129 (3):627-635 (2006)

Authors
Ian Proops
University of Texas at Austin
Abstract
A critical discussion of selected chapters of the first volume of Scott Soames’s Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century. It is argued that this volume falls short of the minimal standards of scholarship appropriate to a work that advertises itself as a history, and, further, that Soames’s frequent heuristic simplifications and distortions, since they are only sporadically identified as such, are more likely confuse than to enlighten the student. These points are illustrated by reference to Soames’s discussions of Russell’s logical system and the place of the theory of descriptions in his ontological development. It is then argued that Soames’s interpretation of the point of G.E. Moore’s famous “proof” of an external world, while not straightforwardly undermined by the textual evidence, is nonetheless questionable, and plausibly overlooks what is novel in Moore’s discussion. This, it is argued, in his attempt to offer a common sense “refutation of idealism”, rather than (as is more commonly supposed) an anti-skeptical argument “from differential certainty”.
Keywords Soames  Russell  Moore  ontology  external world  theory of descriptions  Meinong  descriptions  proof of an external world
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-006-0014-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,375
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Logic and Knowledge.BERTRAND RUSSELL - 1957 - Philosophical Quarterly 7 (29):374.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Functions of Russell’s No Class Theory.Kevin C. Klement - 2010 - Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (4):633-664.
Russell on Incomplete Symbols.Bryan Pickel - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (10):909-923.
Soames on Russell’s Logic: A Reply.Michael Kremer - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 139 (2):209-212.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What’s So Special About Self-Knowledge?Jose Medina - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 129 (3):575-603.
Logic and Metaphysics in Early Analytic Philosophy.Michael Beaney - 2012 - In Lila Haaparanta & Heikki Koskinen (eds.), Categories of Being: Essays on Metaphysics and Logic. Oxford University Press, Usa. pp. 257.
Soames and Moore on Method in Ethics and Epistemology.Sarah McGrath & Thomas Kelly - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (6):1661-1670.
Russell and Moore: The Analytical Heritage.Alan R. White - 1972 - Philosophical Quarterly 22 (86):68.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
98 ( #109,809 of 2,448,899 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #223,910 of 2,448,899 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes