Towards A Better Understanding of Cognitive Polyphasia

Abstract
Despite its intuitive appeal and the empirical evidence for it, the hypothesis of cognitive polyphasia (Moscovici, 1961/1976/2008) remains largely unexplored. This article attempts to clarify some of the ideas behind this concept by examining its operations at the level of individuals and by proposing a conceptual model that includes some elements of social cognition. Indeed, calls for a rapprochement between the theory of social representations and cognitive psychology have been made by Moscovici, in particular, in his 1984 paper on The myth of the lonely paradigm and in his paper on La nouvelle pensée magique (1992) in which he argues that the theory of social representations provides an explanatory framework for the descriptions offered by cognitive psychology and that their combining could translate into a finer understanding of contemporary social phenomena.Building on the results of an empirical examination of the controversy that surrounded the MMR vaccination programme in the UK between 1998 and 2005, different ways of engaging into cognitive polyphasia are proposed, including what can be described as cognitive “monophasia”, that is, the exclusive use of one type of knowledge, at least at the level of the individual. A brief discussion about the implications of the proposed conceptual model for our understanding of cognitive polyphasia and of the different ways of making sense of the world around us concludes this article
Keywords MMR controversy  types of knowledge  Cognitive polyphasia  social cognition
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2011.00468.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,803
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Desiderata for Cognitive Architectures.Ron Sun - 2004 - Philosophical Psychology 17 (3):341-373.
How Can Philosophy Be a True Cognitive Science Discipline?William Bechtel - 2010 - Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (3):357-366.
The Limits of Cognitive Theory in Anthropology.Mark Risjord - 2004 - Philosophical Explorations 7 (3):281 – 297.
Can Ethical Character Be Stimulated And Enabled?Richard P. Nielsen - 1998 - Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (3):581-604.
Grounding Action Representations.Arne M. Weber & Gottfried Vosgerau - 2012 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (1):53-69.
Added to PP index
2011-05-12

Total downloads
18 ( #280,058 of 2,202,706 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #301,061 of 2,202,706 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature