The application of special relativity to the right-angled lever

Foundations of Physics 15 (2):167-173 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Lorentz transformation relates the Einstein-defined measures, associated with two inertial frames, of the space and time coordinates of a body or event. From such information relative velocities and accelerations may be deduced, and their appropriate transformations derived. All other transformations of special relativity are derived from the Lorentz transformation and hence depend on the coordinate measures related by the transformation. In particular, the transformation of forces depends on that for accelerations; hence it may not be appropriately applicable to equilibrium phenomena involving null-acceleration. It is suggested that this is the root of the apparent paradox which arises when the conventional force transformation is applied to the consideration of a right-angled lever in equilibrium in its proper inertial frame. It is shown that this paradox is resolved by the employment of a nonconventional but appropriate special relativistic transformation for forces not associated with corresponding accelerations

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Euclidean Special Relativity.Alexander Gersten - 2003 - Foundations of Physics 33 (8):1237-1251.
Clocks and the Equivalence Principle.Ronald R. Hatch - 2004 - Foundations of Physics 34 (11):1725-1739.
Protophysik und spezielle relativitätstheorie.Wolfgang Schonefeld - 2000 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 31 (1):157-178.
The physical rationale for special relativity.Arthur E. Ruark - 1975 - Foundations of Physics 5 (1):21-36.
Consistency in relativity.R. E. Chatham - 1976 - Foundations of Physics 6 (6):681-685.
A note on relativity before Einstein.M. N. Macrossan - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (2):232-234.
Superluminal Signals and the Resolution of the Causal Paradox.F. Selleri - 2006 - Foundations of Physics 36 (3):443-463.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
10 (#1,165,120)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The logic of special relativity.S. J. Prokhovnik - 1967 - London,: Cambridge University Press.

Add more references