The norms of acceptance

Philosophical Issues 22 (1):316-333 (2012)
Joëlle Proust
Institut Jean Nicod
An area in the theory of action that has received little attention is how mental agency and world-directed agency interact. The purpose of the present contribution is to clarify the rational conditions of such interaction, through an analysis of the central case of acceptance. There are several problems with the literature about acceptance. First, it remains unclear how a context of acceptance is to be construed. Second, the possibility of conjoining, in acceptance, an epistemic component, which is essentially mind-to-world, and a utility component, which requires a world-to-mind direction of fit, is merely posited rather than derived from the rational structure of acceptance. Finally, the norm of acceptance is generally seen as related to truth, which turns out to be inapplicable in a number of cases. We will argue, first, that the specific context-dependence of acceptances is derived from their being mental actions, each embedded in a complex hierarchy of acceptances composing, together, a planning sequence. Second, that acceptances come in several varieties, corresponding to the specific epistemic norm(s) that constitute them. The selection of a particular norm for accepting answers to considerations of utility – to the association of an epistemic goal with an encompassing world-directed action. Once a type of acceptance is selected, however, the epistemic norm constitutive for that acceptance strictly applies. Third, we argue that context-dependence superimposes a decision criterion on the output of the initial epistemic acceptance. Strategic acceptance is regulated by instrumental norms of expected utility, which may rationally lead an agent to screen off her initial epistemic acceptance.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1533-6077.2012.00232.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,954
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason.Michael Bratman - 1987 - Center for the Study of Language and Information.
The Possibility of Practical Reason.David Velleman - 2000 - Oxford University Press.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Delusions, Acceptances, and Cognitive Feelings.Richard Dub - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (1):27-60.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Belief Versus Acceptance.Raimo Tuomela - 2000 - Philosophical Explorations 3 (2):122 – 137.
Epistemic Consequentialism.Philip Percival - 2002 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):121–151.
Adaptive Misbelief or Judicious Pragmatic Acceptance?Keith Frankish - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):520.
Acceptance in Bayesian Philosophy of Science.Patrick Maher - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:153 - 160.
Belief and Contextual Acceptance.Eleonora Cresto - 2010 - Synthese 177 (1):41-66.
Acceptance and Deciding to Believe.Andrei A. Buckareff - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Research 29:173-190.
Moral Judgments and the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction.Jennifer McCrickerd - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Research 26:423-433.
Acceptance Without Belief.Patrick Maher - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:381-392.
Acceptance as a Positive Attitude.Maria Miceli & Cristiano Castelfranchi - 2001 - Philosophical Explorations 4 (2):112 – 134.
Belief, Acceptance, and Cognition.Keith Lehrer - 1983 - In Herman Parret (ed.), On Believing. De Gruyter. pp. 172-183.


Added to PP index

Total downloads
45 ( #143,815 of 2,293,899 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #411,560 of 2,293,899 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature