Understanding all inconsistency compensation as a palliative response to violated expectations

Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (5):285-291 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,272

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response from Schroger.E. Schroger - 1997 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 (2):45-46.
The wandering rat: response to Suddendorf.Michael C. Corballis - 2013 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 (4):152-152.
Response to Brock: noise and autism.Elizabeth Pellicano & David Burr - 2012 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (12):574-575.
In Search of the Spectacular: Travis' Critique of Dummett.Adam Stewart-Wallace - 2015 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy (1):37-53.
Response from McNish, Gewirtz and Davis.K. A. McNish - 1998 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2 (2):42-43.
Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm.Frederick Verbruggen & Gordon D. Logan - 2008 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (11):418-424.
Response bias patterns in young children.Michael Siegal & Luca Surian - 2004 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (12):534-538.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-31

Downloads
76 (#228,798)

6 months
7 (#955,291)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?