A gödelian ontological argument improved

Religious Studies 45 (3):347-353 (2009)
Abstract
Gödel's ontological argument is a formal argument for a being defined in terms of the concept of a positive property. I shall defend several versions of Gödel's argument, using weaker premises than Anderson's (1990) version, and avoiding Oppy's (1996 and 2000) parody refutations
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412509990072
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,478
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Some Emendations of Gödel's Ontological Proof.C. Anthony Anderson - 1990 - Faith and Philosophy 7 (3):291-303.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Pruss's Ontological Arguments.Graham Oppy - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (3):355-363.
Higher-Order Ontological Arguments.Graham Oppy - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):1066-1078.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-07-28

Total downloads
129 ( #38,063 of 2,180,627 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #33,598 of 2,180,627 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums