A religious experience argument for the existence of a holy transcendent being
Much of the discussion had focussed on the question of whether religious experiences are veridical, but then Richard M. Gale asked a more fundamental question: Are they even cognitive? An experience is cognitive if it takes an intentional accusative, such as “red cube” in “I see a red cube,” as opposed to the cognate accusative exemplified by the use of the word “waltz” in “I am dancing a waltz” which is synonymous with “I am dancing waltzily.” Cognitive experiences are objective in the sense that they purport the existence of an object whose..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Marcel on God and Religious Experience, and the Critique of Alston and Hick.Brendan Sweetman - 2006 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (3):407-420.
The New Frontier of Religion and Science: Religious Experience, Neuroscience, and the Transcendent.John Hick - 2007 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Suffering and Transcendence.Eugene Thomas Long - 2006 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 60 (1/3):139 - 148.
Do Near-Death Experiences Provide a Rational Basis for Belief in Life After Death?Andrew J. Dell’Olio - 2010 - Sophia 49 (1):113 - 128.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #175,717 of 2,163,655 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,043 of 2,163,655 )
How can I increase my downloads?