A response to Almeida and Judisch

Authors
Alexander R. Pruss
Baylor University
Abstract
Our new cosmological argument for the existence of God weakens the usual Principle of Sufficient Reason premise that every contingent true proposition has an explanation to a weaker principle (WPSR) that every such proposition could have an explanation. Almeida and Judisch have criticized the premises of our argument for leading to a contradiction. We show that their argument fails, but along the way we are led to clarify the nature of the conclusion of our argument. Moreover, we discuss an argument against us based on a principle of alternate explanation incompatible with our WPSR, and show that his argument fails.
Keywords Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1023384016242
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,982
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
50 ( #125,398 of 2,274,893 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #375,919 of 2,274,893 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature