Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13):1379-1394 (1998)
AbstractIn recent years a series of developments in apparently loosely coupled domains have contributed to the development of new and vital perspectives on how to manage complex social systems such as corporations. These developments include improved communications technologies, increased awareness by constituencies of their potentials for influencing corporate behaviour, increased complexity and reduced transparency in large, heterogeneous organisations, a corresponding reduction in the capacity of traditional accounting and reporting systems to reflect organisational performance, new demands from employees as to their work environments, from customers as to ecological and ethical sensitivity, from civil society and governments as to social and environmental accountability etc.A result is a major shift in the way organisations are choosing to observe themselves and to describe, measure, evaluate and report on their performance. From a focus on efficiency and control to a values-based perspective on management, corporate identity and success. And from a focus on legal compliance and financial performance to a focus on corporate social and ethical responsibility and accountability.
Similar books and articles
Corporate social responsiveness: Choosing between hierarchical and contractual control. [REVIEW]Steven R. Salbu - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (1):27 - 35.
The Influence of Retail Management’s Use of Social Power on Corporate Ethical Values, Employee Commitment, and Performance. [REVIEW]Arne Nygaard & Harald Biong - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 97 (3):341 - 363.
Assessment of attitudes toward corporate social accountability in Britain.Vassilios P. Filios - 1985 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (3):155 - 173.
Corporate social responsibility and public accountability.Vassilios P. Filios - 1984 - Journal of Business Ethics 3 (4):305 - 314.
The hypothesized relationship between accountability and ethical behavior.Danielle Beu & M. Ronald Buckley - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 34 (1):57 - 73.
Corporate accountability in australia: Managing the information environment for corporate accountability. [REVIEW]Lance McMahon - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (8):673 - 681.
Balancing performance, ethics, and accountability.Simon Zadek - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13):1421-1442.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies.Mette Morsing & Majken Schultz - 2006 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 15 (4):323–338.
Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies.Mette Morsing & Majken Schultz - 2006 - Business Ethics: A European Review 15 (4):323-338.
Reviewing the Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: New Evidence and Analysis. [REVIEW]Philipp Schreck - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 103 (2):167-188.
Corporate Identity, Ethics and Reputation in Supplier–Buyer Relationships.Michael Bendixen & Russell Abratt - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 76 (1):69-82.
Codes of conduct in subcontracting networks: A labour law perspective. [REVIEW]André Sobczak - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2-3):225 - 234.