Love and obedience
As Mark Murphy has recently shown, standard justifications of universal divine authority are insufficient.  By “divine authority” I shall mean the doctrine that obedience is morally owed to God by all. God would not give us a command that we did not have a reason to act in accordance with, Murphy argues, but it does not follow that we would be obliged, much less morally obliged, to have the fact of God’s having commanded the action be among our practical reasons for the action. We might, for instance, think that what God has commanded us is prudentially the best policy for us or that it is the best possible evidence for what is on independent grounds morally obligatory.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Divine Command, Divine Will, and Moral Obligation.Mark C. Murphy - 1998 - Faith and Philosophy 15 (1):3-27.
A Jewish Modified Divine Command Theory.Kavka Martin & Rashkover Randi - 2004 - Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):387 - 414.
A New Cosmological Argument.Richard M. Gale & Alexander R. Pruss - 1999 - Religious Studies 35 (4):461-476.
Divine Simplicity and Divine Command Ethics.Susan Peppers-Bates - 2008 - International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (3):361-369.
The Difference Between Obedience Assumed and Obedience Accepted.Christian Dahlman - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (2):187-196.
Divine and Human Agency in Second Temple Judaism and Paul: A Comparative Study.Jason Maston - 2010 - Mohr Siebeck.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #454,901 of 2,152,501 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,611 of 2,152,501 )
How can I increase my downloads?