Semantyczna teoria prawdy a antynomie semantyczne [Semantic Theory of Truth vs. Semantic Antinomies]

Rocznik Filozoficzny Ignatianum 1 (27):341–363 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper presents Alfred Tarski’s debate with the semantic antinomies: the basic Liar Paradox, and its more sophisticated versions, which are currently discussed in philosophy: Strengthen Liar Paradox, Cyclical Liar Paradox, Contingent Liar Paradox, Correct Liar Paradox, Card Paradox, Yablo’s Paradox and a few others. Since Tarski, himself did not addressed these paradoxes—neither in his famous work published in 1933, nor in later papers in which he developed the Semantic Theory of Truth—therefore, We try to defend his concept of truth against these antinomies. It is demonstrated that Tarskian theory of truth is resistant to the paradoxes and it is still the best solution to avoid the antinomies and remain within a classical logic, that is, accepting the laws of noncontradiction, excluded middle, and the principle of bivalence. Thus, the goal of the paper is double—firstly, to show that none of the versions of the Liar Paradox’s is a serious threat to Tarski’s concept of truth, and secondly, that Semantic Theory of Truth allows to remain within classical logic, and at the same time, avoid antinomies—which makes it the most attractive among classical theories of truth.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Semantic Theory of Truth.Jan Woleński - 2019 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The cognitivist account of meaning and the liar paradox.Mark Pinder - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (5):1221-1242.
A Unified Theory of Truth and Paradox.Lorenzo Rossi - 2019 - Review of Symbolic Logic 12 (2):209-254.
Ajdukiewicz, Husserl and Tarski—Concerning the Semantic Theory of Knowledge.Adam Olech - 2020 - Studia Semiotyczne—English Supplement 31:25-72.
Ein Vergleich dreier aussagenlogischer Semantiken.Alexander Zimmermann - 2009 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):44-61.
The truth-tellers paradox.Alexandre Billon - 2013 - Logique Et Analyse (204).
Semantic Paradox and the Metaphysics of Truth.Leon Fairfield Porter - 1995 - Dissertation, University of Michigan
A solution to Moore's paradox.Lennart Åqvist - 1964 - Philosophical Studies 15 (1-2):1 - 5.
Semantics and Truth.Jan Woleński - 2019 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
Truth, Pretense and the Liar Paradox.Bradley Armour-Garb & James A. Woodbridge - 2015 - In T. Achourioti, H. Galinon, J. Martínez Fernández & K. Fujimoto (eds.), Unifying the Philosophy of Truth. Dordrecht: Imprint: Springer. pp. 339-354.
On the Issue of the Liar Antinomy.Stanisław Karolak - 2004 - Studia Semiotyczne—English Supplement 25:21-26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-02

Downloads
36 (#417,258)

6 months
36 (#94,768)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jakub Pruś
Jesuit University Ignatianum In Cracow

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Outline of a theory of truth.Saul Kripke - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):690-716.
Paradox without Self-Reference.Stephen Yablo - 1993 - Analysis 53 (4):251-252.
The Liar Without Relativism.Poppy Mankowitz - 2021 - Erkenntnis 88 (1):267-288.

Add more references