Journal of Business Ethics 162 (1):149-167 (2020)

Authors
Jacob Van
United States Air Force Academy
Abstract
Tournament-like promotion systems are the default in audit firms, which are generally internally owned professional partnerships. While awarding promotions in a contest-like fashion stimulates contestants’ motivation and productivity, it may also upset an organizations’ ethical climate and trigger ethically adverse behaviors. Since nearly all research on promotion tournaments in management has been conducted in public firms, little is known about how these incentive systems operate in professional partnerships. In this study, we analyze how the perception of the two controllable design parameters of promotion tournaments—the relative pay spread between winners and losers and tournament breadth in terms of the number of contestants that compete for a prize—affects audit firm behavior. Survey results provide evidence that the tournament’s perceived breadth prompts adverse behavior, as it does in public firms. Contrary to conventional wisdom, however, the perceived pay spread has no significant effect on adverse behavior, but triggers desirable behaviors instead. Our study suggests that promotion tournaments indeed provide powerful incentives, but also that understanding the unintended consequences of these incentives on organizational ethical climates and behavior requires tournament theory to be contextualized when it is applied in new settings like internally owned professional partnerships.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-018-3991-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,676
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Best-of-Two Contests with Psychological Effects.Alex Krumer - 2013 - Theory and Decision 75 (1):85-100.
Audit Committee Features and Earnings Management: Further Evidence From Singapore.J.-L. W. Mitchell Der Zahvann & Greg Tower - 2004 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (s 2-3):233-258.
Variations on a Game of Gale (I): Coding Strategies.Marion Scheepers - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (3):1035-1043.
Tournament Incentives and Pension Fund Manager Holdings of Socially Performing Stocks.Paul Cox - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:93-98.
Games with 1-Backtracking.Stefano Berardi, Thierry Coquand & Susumu Hayashi - 2010 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (10):1254-1269.
Monetary Incentives, What Are They Good For?Daniel Read - 2005 - Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (2):265-276.
Winning Strategies in Club Games and Their Applications.Bernhard König - 2011 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 57 (1):19-26.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-09-18

Total views
9 ( #876,567 of 2,386,587 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #263,866 of 2,386,587 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes