How to Be a Reasonable Dogmatist

Dissertation, Princeton University (1997)

Authors
James Pryor
New York University
Abstract
Suppose we meet a skeptic who doubts whether any of the beliefs we form about the external world, on the basis of perception, are justified. How can we defend these beliefs? The skeptic thinks these beliefs aren't justified unless we can give them some non-question-begging defense. A dogmatist rejects this assumption. According to the dogmatist, our perceptual beliefs are justified even though it is impossible to give them any non-question-begging defense. ;In this thesis, I first argue that we have good reason to believe that our perceptual beliefs are immediately justified, that is, justified in a way that doesn't derive from our having other justified beliefs, and I argue that if our perceptual beliefs are immediately justified, this commits us to a form of dogmatism. ;I then argue that the skeptic has an extremely powerful argument against the possibility of perceptual justification, and that this argument can be resisted only if one is a dogmatist. ;Finally, I argue for an account of what it is to have a perceptual experience. On the account I defend, to have an experience as of the world's being a certain way is nothing more than having a certain sort of immediate justification for believing that the world is that way. If this account of experience is correct, that would partly explain why some of our perceptual beliefs have the justificatory status I claim for them
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 41,668
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Moorean Facts and Belief Revision, or Can the Skeptic Win?Thomas Kelly - 2005 - Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):179-209.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reasons and Religious Belief.David Michael Levin - 1969 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 12 (1-4):371 – 393.
Contrastive Knowledge.Jonathan Schaffer - 2005 - In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology 1. Oxford University Press. pp. 235.
Pyrrho the Dogmatist.Glenn Lesses - 2002 - Apeiron 35 (3):255 - 271.
Reasonable Women in the Law.Susan Dimock - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (2):153-175.
Reasonable Doubts About Reasonable Nonbelief.Douglas V. Henry - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (3):276-289.
Rape and the Reasonable Man.C. D. & K. Haely - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (2):113-139.
Radical Scepticism Without Epistemic Closure.Sven Rosenkranz - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (3):692-718.
Rape and the Reasonable Man.Donald C. Hubin & Karen Haely - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (2):113-139.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-04-06

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature