Ethical dilemmas in forensic psychiatry: two illustrative cases

Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (6):337-341 (2007)


One approach to the analysis of ethical dilemmas in medical practice uses the “four principles plus scope” approach. These principles are: respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice, along with concern for their scope of application. However, conflicts between the different principles are commonplace in psychiatric practice, especially in forensic psychiatry, where duties to patients often conflict with duties to third parties such as the public. This article seeks to highlight some of the specific ethical dilemmas encountered in forensic psychiatry: the excessive use of segregation for the protection of others, the ethics of using mechanical restraint when clinically beneficial and the use of physical treatment without consent. We argue that justice, as a principle, should be paramount in forensic psychiatry, and that there is a need for a more specific code of ethics to cover specialised areas of medicine like forensic psychiatry. This code should specify that in cases of conflict between different principles, justice should gain precedence over the other principles

Download options


    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,855

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

31 (#373,353)

6 months
1 (#386,031)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pinar Sen
University of Vienna

References found in this work

Autonomy and Long-Term Care.George J. Agich - 1993 - Oxford University Press.

Add more references

Similar books and articles

Care or Custody? Ethical Dilemmas in Forensic Psychiatry.G. Adshead - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (5):302-304.
Forensic Psychiatry: Clinical, Legal and Ethical Issues.G. Adshead - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (2):124-125.