Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (3):357-381 (2015)

Stathis Psillos
University of Athens
This paper is meant to link the philosophical debate concerning the underdetermination of theories by evidence with a rather significant socio-political issue that has been taking place in Canada over the past few years: the so-called ‘death of evidence’ controversy. It places this debate within a broader philosophical framework by discussing the connection between evidence and theory; by bringing out the role of epistemic values in the so-called scientific method; and by examining the role of social values in science. While it should be admitted that social values play an important role in science, the key question for anyone who advocates this view is: what and whose values? The way it is answered makes an important epistemic difference to how the relation between evidence and theory is appraised. I first review various arguments for the claim that evidence underdetermines theory and shows their presuppositions and limitations, using conceptual analysis and historical examples. After broaching the relation between evidence and method in science by highlighting the need to incorporate epistemic values into the scientific method, my discussion focuses on recent arguments for the role of social values in science. Finally, I address the implications of the approach outlined for the current ‘death of evidence’ debate in Canada.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00455091.2015.1079001
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,536
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory.Pierre Duhem - 1954 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal.Heather E. Douglas - 2009 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
The Fate of Knowledge.Helen E. Longino - 2002 - Princeton University Press.
Bayes or Bust?John Earman - 1992 - Bradford.

View all 40 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The New Worries About Science.Janet A. Kourany - forthcoming - Canadian Journal of Philosophy:1-19.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Catching the WAVE: The Weight-Adjusting Account of Values and Evidence.Boaz Miller - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 47:69-80.
The Value of Cognitive Values.Heather Douglas - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):796-806.
Applying Economics, Using Evidence.Roger E. Backhouse & Matthias Klaes - 2009 - Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (2):139-144.
The Force of Counter-Evidence in Science and Religion.Louis Caruana - 2009 - International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (3):361-374.
The Role of Non-Epistemic Values in Engineering Models.Sven Diekmann & Martin Peterson - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):207-218.
Values in Pure and Applied Science.Sven Ove Hansson - 2007 - Foundations of Science 12 (3):257-268.
Defending Science - Within Reason.Susan Haack - 1999 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 3 (2):187-212.


Added to PP index

Total views
83 ( #116,631 of 2,385,594 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #267,971 of 2,385,594 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes