Philosophical Inquiry 39 (1):92-134 (2015)

Stathis Psillos
University of Athens
Drawing the complex terrain of the theories of induction and of the various ways to ground inductive knowledge in the middle ages is the aim of this paper. There have already been two excellent attempts to draw this terrain. The first is by Julius R. Weinberg and the second by E. P. Bos. My attempt differs from theirs in two major respects. The first is that it is more detailed in the examination of the various theories and their relations. The second is that I focus on the role of natural necessities in induction. In particular, I try to place the various conceptions of induction within a network of issues that relate to the problem of universals, natural necessities and a power-based approach to activity in nature. Here is the road map. Section 2 explains Aristotle’s views of induction, as this were mainly developed in Posterior Analytics Book II.19 and states what I take it to be the main dilemma of induction, as this was described by Sextus Empiricus: induction is either perfect and impossible or imperfect and unjustified. In section 3, I move to Thomas Aquinas and his own attempt to justify induction and the actuality of general and necessary principles based on experience by an appeal to the natural light of reason. In section 4 I discuss John Duns Scotus’s reliance on a self-evident maxim to bridge the gap between imperfect and perfect induction. Section 5 moves to William of Ockham ’s peculiar attempt to justify single-instance inductions. Then, section 6 offers a detailed account of Jean Buridan’s ground-breaking re-conceptualisation of induction and the role of intellect in it. Section 7 discusses the critique of induction by Nicolaus of Autrecourt. Finally, section 8 offers a brief account of Pseudo-Scotus’s move from knowledge to opinion
Keywords Ancient Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2015
ISBN(s) 1105-235X
DOI 10.5840/philinquiry20153918
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,206
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Summa Theologica.Thomas Aquinas - 1274 - Hayes Barton Press.
Aquinas.Eleonore Stump - 2003 - Routledge.
Aquinas.Anthony Kenny - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):457-462.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Induction and Natural Necessities.Stathis Psillos - 2017 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 48 (3):327-340.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Nature of Natural Philosophy in the Late Middle Ages.Edward Grant - 2010 - Catholic University of America Press.
Induction, Explanation, and Natural Necessity.John Foster - 1983 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 83:87-101.
God and Reason in the Middle Ages (Review).Eric Lewis - 2002 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (3):393-394.
Are There Necessary Connections in Nature?Milton Fisk - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (3):385-404.
Natural Necessity and Induction.P. J. R. Millican - 1986 - Philosophy 61 (237):395 - 403.
Medieval, the Middle Ages.Fred C. Robinson - 1984 - Speculum 59 (4):745-756.
Varieties of Necessity.Kit Fine - 2002 - In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford Up. pp. 253-281.


Added to PP index

Total views
65 ( #155,398 of 2,419,289 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,429 of 2,419,289 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes