Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (4):234-235 (2002)

In two recent court cases, Ms B, a paralysed competent adult, was allowed to end her life; Mrs Pretty, another paralysed competent adult, was not. In legal terms, the essential difference between the two cases is that Ms B was seeking the withdrawal of treatment, whereas Mrs Pretty was asking for assistance in ending her life. I argue that while this distinction may accurately state the law that governs these situations, it does not rest on a defensible moral basis. Both the women should have been allowed to choose the manner in which they would die
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.28.4.234
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,608
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Where Are You Going to, My Pretty Maids?M. Dyson - 1972 - The Classical Review 22 (03):311-313.
Mrs Pretty and Ms B.K. M. Boyd - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (4):211-212.
The Way Things Were.Ben Caplan & David Sanson - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1):24-39.


Added to PP index

Total views
27 ( #376,702 of 2,385,937 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #555,436 of 2,385,937 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes