This paper offers an intellectual history of the scientific realism debate during the twentieth century. The telling of the tale will explain the philosophical significance and the prospects of the scientific realism debate, through the major turns it went through. The emphasis will be on the relations between empiricism and scientific realism and on the swing from metaphysics-hostile to metaphysics-friendly versions of realism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
One Cannot Be Just a Little Bit Realist: Putnam and van Fraassen.Stathis Psillos - 2012 - In James R. Brown (ed.), Philosophy of Science: The Key Thinkers. Continuum Books. pp. 188.
The Present State of the Scientific Realism Debate.Stathos Psillos - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):705-728.
Recent Debates Over Structural Realism.Daniel McArthur - 2006 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (2):209 - 224.
Humean Perspectives on Structural Realism.Holger Lyre - 2010 - In F. Stadler (ed.), The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science. Springer. pp. 381--397.
Non-Competitor Conditions in the Scientific Realism Debate.Timothy D. Lyons - 2009 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (1):65-84.
How to Be Realistic About Folk Psychology.George Graham & Terence E. Horgan - 1988 - Philosophical Psychology 1 (1):69-81.
Added to index2010-04-16
Total downloads162 ( #28,106 of 2,158,680 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #132,835 of 2,158,680 )
How can I increase my downloads?