The Scope and Limits of the No Miracles Argument1

In Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao Gonzalo, Thomas Uebel, Stephan Hartmann & Marcel Weber (eds.), Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation. Springer. pp. 23--35 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

No new miracles, same old tricks.Jacob Busch - 2008 - Theoria 74 (2):102-114.
Why the ultimate argument for scientific realism ultimately fails.Moti Mizrahi - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):132-138.
Against Miracles.John Collier - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (2):349-.
Why the no‐miracles argument fails.Carl Matheson - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (3):263 – 279.
Hume and Johnson on prophecy and miracles: Historical context.James E. Force - 1982 - Journal of the History of Ideas 43 (3):463 - 476.
Hume's abject failure: the argument against miracles.John Earman - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Levin and Ghins on the “no miracle” argument and naturalism.Mario Alai - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):85-110.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
263 (#73,988)

6 months
17 (#142,297)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stathis Psillos
University of Athens

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references