The Scope and Limits of the No Miracles Argument1

In Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao Gonzalo, Thomas Uebel, Stephan Hartmann & Marcel Weber (eds.), Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation. Springer. pp. 23--35 (2011)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,404
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
No New Miracles, Same Old Tricks.Jacob Busch - 2008 - Theoria 74 (2):102-114.
Why the Ultimate Argument for Scientific Realism Ultimately Fails.Moti Mizrahi - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):132-138.
Against Miracles.John Collier - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (2):349-.
Why the No-Miracles Argument Fails.Carl Matheson - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (3):263 – 279.
Hume and Johnson on Prophecy and Miracles: Historical Context.James E. Force - 1982 - Journal of the History of Ideas 43 (3):463 - 476.
Levin and Ghins on the “No Miracle” Argument and Naturalism.Mario Alai - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):85-110.
Added to PP index
2010-12-22

Total downloads
209 ( #22,310 of 2,226,003 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #19,133 of 2,226,003 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature