What is General Philosophy of Science?


Authors
Stathis Psillos
University of Athens
Abstract
The very idea of a general philosophy of science relies on the assumption that there is this thing called science —as opposed to the various individual sciences. In this programmatic piece I make a case for the claim that general philosophy of science is the philosophy of science in general or science as such. Part of my narrative makes use of history, for two reasons. First, general philosophy of science is itself characterised by an intellectual tradition which aimed to develop a coherent philosophical view of science, qua a part of culture with distinctive epistemic features and a distinctive relation to reality. But, second, this tradition went through some important conceptual shifts which re-oriented it and made it more sensitive to the actual development of science itself. The historical narrative focuses on three such moments: the defining moment, associated with Aristotle, and two major conceptual turns, related to Kant and Duhem. The pressures on the very idea of a general philosophy of science that followed the collapse of the macro-models of science that became popular in the 1960s, the pressures that lay all of the emphasis on fragmentation and not on integration, can be dealt with by a new synthesis within general philosophy of science of the constitutive and the historical, in light of the intellectual tradition that has defined it
Keywords Philosophy of science  History of science  Unity  Aristotle  Duhem  Kant
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10838-012-9182-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,179
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory.Pierre Maurice Marie Duhem - 1954 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Posterior Analytics. Aristotle - 1994 - Clarendon Press.
The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory.Pierre Duhem & Philip P. Wiener - 1955 - Science and Society 19 (1):85-87.
Substance and Function.Ernst Cassirer - 1923 - Dover Publications.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Was Feyerabend an Anarchist? The Structure of ‘Anything Goes’.Jamie Shaw - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 64:11-21.
Guest Editor’s Introduction.Vincenzo Politi - 2019 - Theoria. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 34 (2):167.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Review of Kitcher. [REVIEW]Robert A. Wilson - 2004 - Human Nature Reviews 4 (1):1-13.
The Art of Being Human: A Project for General Philosophy of Science. [REVIEW]Steve Fuller - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (1):113-123.
Articulating the Aims of Science.Nicholas Maxwell - 1977 - Nature 265 (January 6):2.
Why Cognitive Science Needs Philosophy and Vice Versa.Paul Thagard - 2009 - Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (2):237-254.
Braucht Die Wissenschaft Eine Theorie?Klaus Fischer - 1995 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 26 (2):227 - 257.
Popper’s Historical Role: Innovative Dissident. [REVIEW]John Wettersten - 2005 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 36 (1):119 - 133.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-02-28

Total views
162 ( #49,823 of 2,285,438 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #52,531 of 2,285,438 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature