Re-evaluating the credibility of eyewitness testimony: The misinformation effect and the overcritical juror
Episteme 17 (2):255-279 (2020)
AbstractEyewitnesses are susceptible to recollecting that they experienced an event in a way that is consistent with false information provided to them after the event. The effect is commonly called the misinformation effect. Because jurors tend to find eyewitness testimony compelling and persuasive, it is argued that jurors are likely to give inappropriate credence to eyewitness testimony, judging it to be reliable when it is not. It is argued that jurors should be informed about psychological findings on the misinformation effect, to ensure that they lower the credence that they give to eyewitness testimony to reflect the unreliability of human memory that is demonstrated by the effect. Here I present a new argument, the overcritical juror argument, to support the conclusion that eyewitnesses are likely to make inappropriate credence assignments to eyewitness testimony. Whereas previously authors have argued that jurors will tend to give too much credence to eyewitness testimony, I identify circumstances in which jurors will give too little credence to some pieces of testimony. In my view jurors should be informed by psychological findings relating to the misinformation effect to ensure that they do not lower the credence that they give to eyewitness testimony when they should not.
Similar books and articles
Promoting Eyewitness Testimony Quality: Warning Vs. Reinforced Self-Affirmation as Methods of Reduction of the Misinformation Effect.Romuald Polczyk & Malwina Szpitalak - 2013 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 44 (1):85-91.
The Information Effect: Constructive Memory, Testimony, and Epistemic Luck.Kourken Michaelian - 2013 - Synthese 190 (12):2429-2456.
Warning Against Warnings: Alerted Subjects May Perform Worse. Misinformation, Involvement and Warning as Determinants of Witness Testimony.Romuald Polczyk & Malwina Szpitalak - 2010 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 41 (3):105-112.
Indirect Testing of Eyewitness Memory: The Effect of Misinformation.Chad Dodson & Daniel Reisberg - 1991 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (4):333-336.
Undoing Suggestive Influence on Memory: The Reversibility of the Eyewitness Misinformation Effect.Aileen Oeberst & Hartmut Blank - 2012 - Cognition 125 (2):141-159.
The “Memory” Misinformation Effect May Not Be Caused by Memory Failures: Exploring Memory States of Misinformed Subjects.Romuald Polczyk - 2017 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 48 (3):388-400.
The Effects of Memory Conformity and the Cross-Race Effect in Eyewitness Testimony.Hiran Perera-W. A. - 2016 - SSRN Electronic Journal 1:1.
Testimony: Evidence and Responsibility.Matthew Carl Weiner - 2003 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
A Defense of Reductionism About Testimonial Justification of Beliefs.Tomoji Shogenji - 2006 - Noûs 40 (2):331–346.
Baconian Probability and Hume’s Theory of Testimony.Dorothy Coleman - 2001 - Hume Studies 27 (2):195-226.
On the Special Insult of Refusing Testimony.Allan Hazlett - 2017 - Philosophical Explorations 20 (sup1):37-51.
Children's Eyewitness Reports After Exposure to Misinformation From Parents.Debra Ann Poole & D. Stephen Lindsay - 2001 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 7 (1):27.
Evaluating Corroborative Evidence.Douglas Walton & Chris Reed - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (4):531-553.
Counterfeit Testimony: Lies, Trust, and the Exchange of Information.Nicholas Tebben & John Philip Waterman - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (11):3101-3117.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Eyewitness evaluation through inference to the best explanation.Hylke Jellema - 2022 - Synthese 200 (5):1-29.
References found in this work
What is Justified Belief?Alvin Goldman - 1979 - In George Pappas (ed.), Justification and Knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel. pp. 1-25.
The Evolution of Foresight: What is Mental Time Travel, and is It Unique to Humans?Thomas Suddendorf & Michael C. Corballis - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):299-313.
Is Memory for Remembering? Recollection as a Form of Episodic Hypothetical Thinking.Felipe De Brigard - 2014 - Synthese 191 (2):1-31.
Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology.F. C. Bartlett - 1933 - Philosophy 8 (31):374-376.