Journal of Medical Ethics (forthcoming)
AbstractWe would like to thank each of the commentators on our feature article for their thoughtful engagement with our arguments. All the commentaries raise important questions about our proposed justification for natural immunity exemptions to COVID-19 vaccine mandates. Thankfully, for some of the points raised, we can simply signal our agreement. For instance, Reiss is correct to highlight that our article did not address the important US-centric considerations she helpfully raises and fruitfully discusses. We also agree with Williams about the need to provide a clear rationale for mandates, and to obtain different kinds of data in support of possible policies.Unfortunately, we lack the space to engage with every one of the more critical comments raised in this rich set of commentaries; as such, in this response, we shall focus on a discussion of hybrid immunity, which underlies a number of different arguments evident in the commentaries, before concluding with some reflections responding to Lipsitch’s concern about the appropriate standard of proof in this context.
Similar books and articles
The Unnaturalistic Fallacy: COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates Should Not Discriminate Against Natural Immunity.Jonathan Pugh, Julian Savulescu, Rebecca C. H. Brown & Dominic Wilkinson - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (6):371-377.
Vaccine Mandates Need a Clear Rationale to Identify Which Exemptions Are Appropriate.Bridget Williams - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (6):384-385.
No Right Answer: Officials Need Discretion on Whether to Allow Natural Immunity Exemptions.Dorit Reiss - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (6):380-381.
Response to Commentators on “The Real Problem with Equipoise”.Winston Chiong - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):W42-W45.
Revisiting Equipoise: A Response to Gifford.Paul B. Miller & Charles Weijer - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (3):227-246.
Response to My Commentators.Nicholas Wolterstorff - 2010 - Studies in Christian Ethics 23 (2):197-204.
Mala Prohibita and Proportionality.Youngjae Lee - 2021 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 15 (3):425-446.
Equipoise as a Means of Managing Uncertainty: Personal, Communal and Proxy.P. Alderson - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (3):135-139.
What Kind of Principle Is Clinical Equipoise?Luca Chiapperino & Cecilia Nardini - 2014 - Theoretical and Applied Ethics 3 (1):1-16.
Public Wrongs and the Criminal Law.Ambrose Y. K. Lee - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (1):155-170.
Freedman's 'Clinical Equipoise' and Sliding-Scale All-Dimensions-Considered Equipoise'.Fred Gifford - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (4):399 – 426.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
The Moral Obligation to Be Vaccinated: Utilitarianism, Contractualism, and Collective Easy Rescue.Alberto Giubilini, Thomas Douglas & Julian Savulescu - 2018 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (4):547-560.
Justifications for Non-Consensual Medical Intervention: From Infectious Disease Control to Criminal Rehabilitation.Jonathan Pugh & Thomas Douglas - 2016 - Criminal Justice Ethics 35 (3):205-229.
Who Commits the Unnaturalistic Fallacy?Kyle Ferguson - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (6):382-383.
Wrong Question and the Wrong Standard of Proof.Marc Lipsitch - forthcoming - Journal of Medical Ethics.