Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):339-352 (2002)

Bill Puka
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Effective moral education must address roadblocks in moral thinking, not merely urging moral development forward. Seen in a certain way, Kohlberg's moral stages plot a course of immoral judgement, marked by bias and manipulation, not a steady march toward justice. The Defining Issues Test bodes an even more useful glimpse into the nefarious, focused on ideological content and commitment. These may prove the greatest obstacles to moral growth and accord. We consider these prospects along with the promise of converting alleged DIT deficits into assets
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/0305724022000008157
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,308
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Measurement of Moral Judgment.Anne Colby - 1987 - Cambridge University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Tweaking the Four-Component Model.Howard J. Curzer - 2014 - Journal of Moral Education 43 (1):104-123.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rethinking Moral Growth in College and Beyond.Glen Rogers - 2002 - Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):325-338.
Goethe's Faust Revisited: Lessons From DIT Research.Larry Nucci - 2002 - Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):315-324.
Changing Moral Judgement in Divinity Students.Wilton H. Bunch - 2005 - Journal of Moral Education 34 (3):363-370.


Added to PP index

Total views
8 ( #901,991 of 2,326,000 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #445,586 of 2,326,000 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes