Embarrassment: A philosophical analysis

Philosophy 76 (4):515-540 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper considers the sorts of evaluations that underlie the emotion of embarrassment, by questioning what unifies the various kinds of situations in which this emotion typically arises. It examines the difference between embarrassment and shame, and then addresses problems with the accounts of embarrassment proposed by previous authors, in particular Solomon, Taylor and Goffman. It proposes a new model, on which the emotion involves viewing an interpersonal situation, in which you are involved, as containing an exposure to which you are averse. This may either be your own exposure to others, or others' exposure to yourself. The emotion thus reflects the value we attach to placing limits on the sorts of interactions and contact we have with other people.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,499

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
139 (#172,500)

6 months
14 (#295,556)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Embarrassment.Yotam Benziman - 2020 - Journal of Value Inquiry 54 (1):77-89.
Cringe.Thomas J. Spiegel - 2025 - Social Epistemology 39 (3):229-240.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references