Religious Studies 13 (4):477-483 (1977)
Abstract |
In a recent paper Anthony Flew gives an argument which can be outlined as follows: 1. Any attempt to give a ‘free will defence’ must be based either on a compatibilist notion of free will or a libertarian, incompatibilist, notion of free will. 2. A free will defence based on a compatibilist notion of free will must fail, for on a compatibilist view of free will, God could make creatures who were free but never chose evil. 3. A free will defence based on a libertarian notion of free will might have other difficulties, but on a libertarian view of free will God could not both leave men free and bring it about that they never chose evil. 4. But a free will defence based on an incompatibilist, libertarian notion of free will can be rejected, since: It is not clear that the ordinary use of such key terms as ‘action’ and ‘choice’ carry any implications of libertarian free will. If such terms did carry the implication of libertarian free will it becomes hard to see how anyone could be in a position to know that a choice had been made or an action performed. The possession of libertarian free will by created beings seems to be incompatible with the essential theistic doctrine that all created beings are always utterly dependent on God as their sustaining cause. 5. Therefore the free will defence fails
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1017/S0034412500010362 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
On Flew’s Compatibilism and His Objections to Theistic Libertarianism.Hakan Gundogdu - 2015 - Kaygı Uludağ University Faculty of Arts and Sciences Journal of Philosophy 25:115-142.
Similar books and articles
Compatibilism and the Free Will Defence: A Reply to Bishop.Kenneth J. Perszyk - 1999 - Australasian Journal of Philosopy 77 (1):92-105.
Alternative Possibilities and the Free Will Defence.Andrew Eshleman - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (3):267-286.
A Modified Flew Attack on the Free Will Defense.Frank B. Dilley - 1982 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):25-34.
Is the Free Will Defence Irrelevant?: FRANK B. DILLEY.Frank B. Dilley - 1982 - Religious Studies 18 (3):335-364.
The Possibility of a Free-Will Defence for the Problem of Natural Evil.Tim Mawson - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (1):23-42.
Himma on the Free-Will Argument: A Critical Response.Anders Kraal - 2013 - Religious Studies 49 (4):491-503.
A Simpler Free Will Defence.C’Zar Bernstein & Nathaniel Helms - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 77 (3):197-203.
New Directions on Free Will.Robert Kane - 1999 - In The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. Bowling Green: Philosophy Doc Ctr. pp. 135-142.
Libet and the Case for Free Will Scepticism.Tim Bayne - 2011 - In Richard Swinburne (ed.), Free Will and Modern Science. Oup/British Academy.
The Religious Adequacy of Free-Will Theism.David M. Ciocchi - 2002 - Religious Studies 38 (1):45-61.
Locke on the Freedom of the Will.Vere Chappell - 1994 - In G. A. J. Rogers (ed.), Locke's Philosophy: Content and Context. Oxford University Press. pp. 101--21.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-02-05
Total views
13 ( #772,900 of 2,520,891 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,438 of 2,520,891 )
2015-02-05
Total views
13 ( #772,900 of 2,520,891 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,438 of 2,520,891 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads