In Wenchao Li (ed.), Für unser Glück oder das Glück anderer. Georg Olms. pp. 49-57 (2016)

Authors
Stephen Puryear
North Carolina State University
Abstract
I argue that Leibniz's rejection of the hypothesis of thinking matter on grounds of unintelligibility conflicts with his position on sensible qualities such as color. In the former case, he argues that thought must be a modification of something immaterial because we cannot explain thought in mechanical terms. In the latter case, however, he (rightly) grants that we cannot explain sensible qualities in mechanical terms, that is, cannot explain why a certain complex mechanical quality gives rise to the appearance of a certain sensible quality, even while insisting that sensible qualities are modifications of bodies. I argue that the two cases are analogous in the relevant respects, and that Leibniz's (plausible) position on sensible qualities should have thrown his Principle of Intelligibility into doubt.
Keywords Leibniz  thought  perception  color  sensible qualities  Principle of Intelligibility
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Leibniz's Mill Arguments Against Materialism.Stewart Duncan - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):250-72.
Leibniz on the Metaphysics of Color.Stephen Puryear - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (2):319-346.
Leibniz's Mill Argument Against Mechanical Materialism Revisited.Paul Lodge - 2014 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 1.
Leibniz's Principle of Intelligibility.Donald P. Rutherford - 1992 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 9 (1):35-49.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Leibniz on the Metaphysics of Color.Stephen Puryear - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (2):319-346.
Was Leibniz Confused About Confusion?Stephen M. Puryear - 2005 - The Leibniz Review 15:95-124.
Kant's Idealism and the Secondary Quality Analogy.Lucy Allais - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):459-484.
Color Experience: A Semantic Theory.Mohan Matthen - 2010 - In Jonathan Cohen & Mohan Matthen (eds.), Color Ontology and Color Science. MIT Press. pp. 67--90.
Perception and Representation in Leibniz.Stephen Puryear - 2006 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Primary and Secondary Qualties.Peter W. Ross - 2016 - In Mohan Matthen (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception. Oxford University Press. pp. 405-421.
Concepts of Secondary Qualities.James Hill - 1998 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 5 (Supplement):91-98.
Sensory Qualities, Sensible Qualities, Sensational Qualities.Alex Byrne - 2011 - In Brian McLaughlin, Ansgar Beckermann & Sven Walter (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Constructing a Theory of Sounds.Casey O'Callaghan - 2010 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 5:247-270.
Leibniz and Sensible Qualities.Christian Leduc - 2010 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (5):797-819.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-08-05

Total views
209 ( #40,493 of 2,343,879 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #23,484 of 2,343,879 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes