Can a secularist appreciate religious music?

Philosophy 83 (3):391-395 (2008)
Abstract
David Pugmire has argued that secularists can genuinely appreciate religious music because of our imaginative powers combined with the 'Platonic' nature of the emotions expressed in such music. I argue that Pugmire is wrong on both counts. Religious music is 'Platonic' not because it is subject to levels of imagination but because it has a definite object which makes imaginative readings inferior. Moreover, since religious music does have a clear object taken by the believer as real, a gap exists that cannot be bridged by the imagination of the secularist, even imagination of the emotional 'last instance'
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0031819108000740
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,628
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
12 ( #432,367 of 2,235,944 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #446,848 of 2,235,944 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature