Virtue Theory and the Self

Teaching Philosophy 21 (2):153-162 (1998)
Abstract
It is well-observed that undergraduate students frequently profess ethical relativism, but they also frequently defend ethical egoism. The author suggests four reasons why ethical egoism is so common among undergraduates: since college students’ identity is in flux, a normative framework in which the self may be appealed to as a foundation for value offers a sense of security; most college students have relatively few obligations beyond themselves; media and advertising tend to promote and reward egoism; egoism is easy and affords students the appearance of being non-judgmental and tolerant. Nevertheless, the author notes, even the most diehard egoist holds the belief that their ego works to realize some potential, which means they are in at least a minimal sense committed to something beyond themselves. Virtue theory is especially useful in exploiting this commitment to show student egoists the plausibility of non-egoistic normative viewpoints. Discussing the examples of true friendship, courage, generosity, honest self-presentation, eudaemonia, and temperance, the author explains how virtue theory can articulate values which the student egoist is committed to but which cannot be satisfactorily accounted for by egoistic frameworks. The author concludes by addressing the importance of group discussion for lending concreteness to the lessons of virtue theory
Keywords Teaching Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0145-5788
DOI 10.5840/teachphil199821220
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,941
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Relational Ethics and Virtue Theory.Daniel Putman - 1991 - Metaphilosophy 22 (3):231-238.
Virtue and Luck, Epistemic and Otherwise.John Greco - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (3):353-366.
Virtue Theory in Ethics Courses.Daniel Putman - 1992 - Teaching Philosophy 15 (1):51-56.
Examining Loyalty: The Folk & The Philosopher.John D. Baldari - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Nevada, Reno
Aristotle and the Environment.Susanne E. Foster - 2002 - Environmental Ethics 24 (4):409-428.
Kant's Conception of Virtue.Lara Denis - 2006 - In Paul Guyer (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
The Primacy of Virtue in Children's Moral Development.Daniel Putman - 1995 - Journal of Moral Education 24 (2):175-183.
Virtue and Self-Deception.Daniel A. Putman - 1987 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):549-557.
An Introduction to Aretaic Theories of Law.Colin Farrelly & Lawrence B. Solum - 2007 - In Colin Patrick Farrelly & Lawrence Solum (eds.), Virtue Jurisprudence. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Virtue and the Practice of Modern Medicine.Daniel A. Putman - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (4):433-443.
Response to My Critics.Julia Driver - 2004 - Utilitas 16 (1):33-41.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total downloads
20 ( #310,630 of 2,293,869 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #410,854 of 2,293,869 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature