Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong: by Jerry A. Fodor

Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (2):81-82 (1999)

Authors
Zenon Pylyshyn
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01236-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,350
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

" Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong", de Jerry Fodor.Francisco Cueto Santos - 1999 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):111-115.
Why Concepts Can't Be Theories.Jack M. C. Kwong - 2006 - Philosophical Explorations 9 (3):309-325.
Granny's Campaign for Safe Science.Daniel C. Dennett - 1990 - In Barry M. Loewer & Georges Rey (eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Blackwell.
Radical Concept Nativism.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 2002 - Cognition 86 (1):25-55.
The Structure of Lexical Concepts.Ken Daley - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 150 (3):349 - 372.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-21

Total views
21 ( #449,992 of 2,291,118 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #829,891 of 2,291,118 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature