In defence of ‘Religion’: E. H. PYLE

Religious Studies 3 (1):347-353 (1967)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is the term ‘religion’ otiose or misleading? Is what is commonly understood to be religion the enemy of faith? Can the study of religion be upheld as a discipline of academic respectability? The interrelation of these questions is close, and not without complexity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Malebranche (review).Antonia LoLordo - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (1):124-125.
Is religion dangerous?Keith Ward - 2006 - Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Pub. Co..
Malebranche.Andrew Pyle - 2003 - New York: Routledge.
The living God: basal forms of personal religion.Nathan Söderblom - 1933 - New York: AMS Press. Edited by Yngve Brilioth.
The Study of Religion after Davidson and Rorty.Nancy Frankenberry - 2014 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 35 (3):195-210.
Phenomenology of religion.Joseph Dabney Bettis - 1969 - New York,: Harper & Row.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
7 (#1,316,802)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references