On Priest's logic of paradox

Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 5 (2):219-225 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The present paper concerns a technical study of PRIEST'S logic of paradox [Pri 79], We prove that this logic has no proper paraconsistent strengthening. It is also proved that the mentioned logic is the largest paraconsistent one satisfaying TARSKI'S conditions for the classical conjunction and disjunction together with DE MORGAN'S laws for negation. Finally, we obtain for the logic of paradox an algebraic completeness result related to Kleene lattices.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why Priest's reassurance is not reassuring.Jc Beall - 2012 - Analysis 72 (3):517-525.
Extensions of Priest-da Costa Logic.Thomas Macaulay Ferguson - 2014 - Studia Logica 102 (1):145-174.
Cut-offs and their Neighbors.Achille C. Varzi - 2003 - In Jc Beall (ed.), Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox. Clarendon Press. pp. 24–38.
Logic of paradox revisited.Graham Priest - 1984 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 13 (2):153 - 179.
The logic of paradox.Graham Priest - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):219 - 241.
Logic of Paradox.Graham Priest - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):219-241.
Gentzen's cut-free calculus versus the logic of paradox.Alexej P. Pynko - 2010 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 39 (1/2):35-42.
Are there true contradictions? A critical discussion of Graham Priest's, beyond the limits of thought.Jürgen Dümont & Frank Mau - 1998 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 29 (2):289-299.
On a Paradox of Hilbert and Bernays.Priest Graham - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (1):45-56.


Added to PP

43 (#356,248)

6 months
7 (#382,198)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?