Subprevarieties versus extensions. Application to the logic of paradox

Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):756-766 (2000)
Abstract
In the present paper we prove that the poset of all extensions of the logic defined by a class of matrices whose sets of distinguished values are equationally definable by their algebra reducts is the retract, under a Galois connection, of the poset of all subprevarieties of the prevariety generated by the class of the algebra reducts of the matrices involved. We apply this general result to the problem of finding and studying all extensions of the logic of paradox (viz., the implication-free fragment of any non-classical normal extension of the relevance-mingle logic). In order to solve this problem, we first study the structure of prevarieties of Kleene lattices. Then, we show that the poset of extensions of the logic of paradox forms a four-element chain, all the extensions being finitely many-valued and finitely-axiomatizable logics. There are just two proper consistent extensions of the logic of paradox. The first is the classical logic that is relatively axiomatized by the Modus ponens rule for the material implication. The second extension, being intermediate between the logic of paradox and the classical logic, is the one relatively axiomatized by the Ex Contradictione Quodlibet rule
Keywords Propositional Logic   Extension   Relative Axiomatization   Matrix   Prevariety   Galois Retraction   Kleene Lattice   Paraconsisent Logic   Logic of Paradox   Paraconsistent Kleene Lattice   Classical Logic   Classical Kleene Lattice   Boolean Lattice
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2586567
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,756
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Characterizing Belnap's Logic Via De Morgan's Laws.Alexej P. Pynko - 1995 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 41 (4):442-454.
On Priest's Logic of Paradox.Alexej P. Pynko - 1995 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 5 (2):219-225.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
On Extensions of Intermediate Logics by Strong Negation.Marcus Kracht - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 27 (1):49-73.
A Splitting Logic in NExt(KTB).Yutaka Miyazaki - 2007 - Studia Logica 85 (3):381 - 394.
On Logics with Coimplication.Frank Wolter - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 27 (4):353-387.
Protoalgebraic Logics.W. J. Blok & Don Pigozzi - 1986 - Studia Logica 45 (4):337 - 369.
How to Avoid Deviance (in Logic).Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Amit Malhotra - 2002 - History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (3):215--36.
The Lattice of Modal Logics: An Algebraic Investigation.W. J. Blok - 1980 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 45 (2):221-236.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

10 ( #435,458 of 2,177,988 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #317,698 of 2,177,988 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums