Objections to Radical Constructivism

Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):12-18 (2010)

Abstract
Context: A number of objections that are frequently raised in the literature against radical constructivism, including: the charge of solipsism, allegations of self-refutation, social and moral reservations, and the accusation that RC cannot explain the success of science. Problem: These four objections are sought to be refuted. Results: 1. Solipsism is only troublesome against the background of a realist ontological perspective. 2. The truth-value of any proposition is only defined relative to some ontological context, thus self-refutation, as constituting a logical problem, does not arise. 3. Any ethical argumentation derives from one’s own personal views on ethical matters: their construction being a personal responsibility such that no one else can tell a person how to construct the “right ethics.” 4. In the relativist ontology of radical constructivism, a scientific theory is regarded as a model imposed on natural phenomena; its success is due to the capabilities of its constructor/scientists. Implications: It is found that the objections are based on an (overt or tacit) adoption of the antithetical viewpoint of scientific realism. In other words, radical constructivism is being criticised for not promoting a realist ontology
Keywords ethics  ontology  realism  relativism  science  self-refutation  solipsism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,305
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Radical Constructivism in Communication Science.A. Scholl - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):51-57.
Onwards and Upwards, Radical Constructivism. A Guest Commentary.P. Cariani - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):127-132.
Against Constructivism.M. A. Boden - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):84-89.
Radical Constructivism and its Failings: Anti‐Realism and Individualism.Mark Olssen - 1996 - British Journal of Educational Studies 44 (3):275-295.
Radikaler Konstruktivismus Und Konstruktionismus.Hans Jürgen Wendel - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (2):323 - 352.
How to Engage with Experimental Practices? Moderate Versus Radical Constructivism.Henk van den Belt - 2003 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 34 (2):201-219.
How to Engage with Experimental Practices? Moderate Versus Radical Constructivism.Henk van den Belt - 2003 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 34 (2):201 - 219.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-11-20

Total views
16 ( #548,649 of 2,280,229 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #238,437 of 2,280,229 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature