The role of metaphor in scientific epistemology: A constructivist perspective and consequences for science education

Science & Education 11 (5):443-457 (2002)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,629
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Organisms ≠ Machines.Daniel J. Nicholson - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):669-678.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Physics Develops Unaffected by Constructivism.Helmut Schwegler - 2001 - Foundations of Science 6 (4):241-253.
The Radical Constructivist View of Science.Ernst von Glasersfeld - 2001 - Foundations of Science 6 (1-3):31-43.
Should the Role of Epistemology in Studying Scientific Knowledge Be Rethought?Mamchur Elena - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 43:117-120.
Social Constructivism and the Aims of Science.Kareem Khalifa - 2010 - Social Epistemology 24 (1):45 – 61.
The Methodological Significance of Scientific Metaphor.Guichun Guo - 2007 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):437-453.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-21

Total views
7 ( #925,042 of 2,280,716 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #837,375 of 2,280,716 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature