A gene's eye view of Darwinian populations

Biology and Philosophy 26 (6):905-913 (2011)
Abstract
Biologists and philosophers differ on whether selection should be analyzed at the level of the gene or of the individual. In Peter Godfrey-Smith’s book, Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection, he argues that individuals can be good members of Darwinian populations, whereas genes rarely can. I take issue with parts of this view, and suggest that Godfrey-Smith’s scheme for thinking about Darwinian populations is also applicable to populations of genes
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10539-010-9241-3
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,224
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Strategic Gene.David Haig - 2012 - Biology and Philosophy 27 (4):461-479.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Cancer Cells and Adaptive Explanations.Pierre-Luc Germain - 2012 - Biology and Philosophy 27 (6):785-810.
Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection. [REVIEW]Massimo Pigliucci - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (8).
Darwinism About Darwinism. [REVIEW]Joeri Witteveen - 2009 - Biological Theory 4 (2):207-213.
Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection.Gry Oftedal - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):333-336.
Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection.Peter Gildenhuys - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):192-195.
Added to PP index
2011-03-03

Total downloads
31 ( #169,906 of 2,191,999 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #144,931 of 2,191,999 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature