Studia Logica 90 (2):211 - 247 (2008)

Abstract
The intention here is that of giving a formal underpinning to the idea of 'meaning-is-use' which, even if based on proofs, it is rather different from proof-theoretic semantics as in the Dummett-Prawitz tradition. Instead, it is based on the idea that the meaning of logical constants are given by the explanation of immediate consequences, which in formalistic terms means the effect of elimination rules on the result of introduction rules, i. e. the so-called reduction rules. For that we suggest an extension to the Curry-Howard interpretation which draws on the idea of labelled deduction, and brings back Frege's device of variable-abstraction to operate on the labels (i. e., proof-terms) alongside formulas of predicate logic.
Keywords Philosophy   Computational Linguistics   Mathematical Logic and Foundations   Logic
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11225-008-9150-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,401
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is Logic?Ian Hacking - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (6):285-319.
Meaning Approached Via Proofs.Dag Prawitz - 2006 - Synthese 148 (3):507-524.
A Natural Extension of Natural Deduction.Peter Schroeder-Heister - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (4):1284-1300.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total views
22 ( #490,970 of 2,445,468 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,040 of 2,445,468 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes