Critical Review 26 (1-2):129-150 (2014)

Abstract
ABSTRACTHélène Landemore's Democratic Reason offers a new justification for democracy and for broad-based citizen participation, appealing to the “emergent” intelligence of large, diverse groups. She argues that ordinary citizens should rule as directly as possible because they will make better informed, more intelligent decisions than, for example, appointed officials, councils of experts, or even elected representatives. The foundation of this conclusion is the premise that “diversity trumps ability” in a wide range of contexts. But the main support for that claim is merely a series of computer experiments that are strongly biased toward that result and tell us essentially nothing about decision making in real-world political settings. Moreover, Landemore's analyses of alternative forms of rule deal only in abstract comparisons between sharply distinguished ideal types. Among other difficulties, they entirely overlook the central consideration in such comparisons: the relative ability of any decision-making process to go beyond stereotyped, intrinsic strategies and integrate multiple sources and varieties of information. In the end, Landemore's claims for the superior intelligence of broadly participatory forms are thus not supported by credible evidence.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/08913811.2014.907046
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,047
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Participation and Democratic Theory.Carole Pateman - 1975 - Cambridge University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Yes, We Can : Answers to Critics.Hélène Landemore - 2014 - Critical Review 26 (1-2):184-237.
Political Epistemology.Jeffrey Friedman - 2014 - Critical Review 26 (1-2):1-32.
Are Dissenters Epistemically Arrogant?Tine Hindkjaer Madsen - forthcoming - Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-23.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Creating Managerial Ethical Profiles: An Exploratory Cluster Analysis.Gian Casali - 2008 - Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies 13 (2):27-34.
Intelligent Advertising.Richard Adams - 2004 - AI and Society 18 (1):68-81.
Beyond Professional Ethics: Issues and Agendas. [REVIEW]Beth Savan - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (2-3):179 - 185.
What Are Groups?Katherine Ritchie - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (2):257-272.
Normal Subgroups of Nonstandard Symmetric and Alternating Groups.John Allsup & Richard Kaye - 2007 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 46 (2):107-121.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-09-04

Total views
10 ( #811,510 of 2,344,273 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #513,994 of 2,344,273 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes