Rationalization is irrational and self-serving, but useful

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43:e42 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rationalization through reduction of cognitive dissonance does not have the function of representational exchange. Instead, cognitive dissonance is part of the “psychological immune system” (Gilbert 2006; Mandelbaum 2019) and functions to protect the self-concept against evidence of incompetence, immorality, and instability. The irrational forms of attitude change that protect the self-concept in dissonance reduction are useful primarily for maintaining motivation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,391

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A discourse on Forestry science.Laurent Umans - 1993 - Agriculture and Human Values 10 (4):26-40.
Rationalization and self-sabotage.Jason D'Cruz - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43.
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc: Some Benefits of Rationalization.Jesse S. Summers - 2017 - Philosophical Explorations 20 (sup1):21-36.
Rationalization of emotion is also rational.Peter Railton - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43:e43.
Rational rationalization and System 2.Wim De Neys - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-16

Downloads
63 (#191,211)

6 months
6 (#133,567)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jake Quilty-Dunn
Washington University in St. Louis

References found in this work

Add more references