Rationalization is irrational and self-serving, but useful

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43:e42 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rationalization through reduction of cognitive dissonance does not have the function of representational exchange. Instead, cognitive dissonance is part of the “psychological immune system” (Gilbert 2006; Mandelbaum 2019) and functions to protect the self-concept against evidence of incompetence, immorality, and instability. The irrational forms of attitude change that protect the self-concept in dissonance reduction are useful primarily for maintaining motivation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral Education for Overcoming Moral Rationalization. 문경호 - 2018 - Journal of Ethics: The Korean Association of Ethics 1 (119):61-79.
In Search of a “Happy Ending” in Legal Interpretation: Cognitive Dissonance in Judicial Decision-Making.Mikołaj Pietrzyk - forthcoming - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique:1-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-16

Downloads
98 (#221,949)

6 months
8 (#390,329)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jake Quilty-Dunn
Rutgers - New Brunswick

References found in this work

Add more references