Religious Studies 11 (3):265-281 (1975)

Abstract
It has become fashionable to try to prove the impossibility of there being a God. Findlay's celebrated ontological disproof has in the past quarter century given rise to vigorous controversy. More recently James Rachels has offered a moral argument intended to show that there could not be a being worthy of worship. In this paper I shall examine the position Rachels is arguing for in some detail. I shall endeavor to show that his argument is unsound and, more interestingly, that the genuine philosophical perplexity which motivates it can be dispelled without too much difficulty
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412500008416
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,355
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On Worshipping an Embodied God.Grace M. Jantzen - 1978 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (3):511 - 519.
Moral Autonomy and Divine Commands.Chan L. Coulter - 1989 - Religious Studies 25 (1):117 - 129.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Religious Obedience and Moral Autonomy.Philip L. Quinn - 1975 - Religious Studies 11 (3):265 - 281.
Cooking with Philip Quinn.Robert McKim - 2012 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71 (3):239-245.
Worship and Moral Autonomy.Joseph L. Lombardi - 1988 - Religious Studies 24 (2):101-119.
Does Cognitive Humility Lead to Religious Tolerance? Reflections on Craig Versus Quinn.Michael S. Jones - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 78 (1):73-89.
God’s Call: Moral Realism, God’s Commands, and Human Autonomy. [REVIEW]Philip L. Quinn - 2002 - International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (1):120-122.
Epistemic Parity and Religious Argument.Philip L. Quinn - 1991 - Philosophical Perspectives 5:317-341.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-05

Total views
45 ( #253,485 of 2,519,519 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,519 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes